Hickman's cage-free, eco-friendly changes egged on by changing consumer preferences
When California was considering its restrictions on cages in 2008 and 2010, early research showed some consumers willing to pay a premium for the eggs that surpassed the extra cost to producers, says Timothy Richards, professor of agribusiness.
If chickens could talk, they'd probably say they like living cage-free better. Major retailers and breakfast-centered restaurants prefer cage-free eggs, too — to please their affluent customers. The higher prices, however, may be a challenge for low-income consumers, according to Professor of Agribusiness Timothy Richards.
In this post on azcentral.com on Sept. 15, 2017:
Research shows it can cost 20 to 40 percent more to produce cage-free eggs, Richards said, depending on how well a particular farm runs its operations.
"There are welfare effects. It is incredibly regressive because it is the less wealthy people who would have bought the Walmart battery (cage) produced eggs, but wealthier people who demand cage free."
Latest news
- Prices go up while wages go down for Arizonans, according to figures
An ASU economist discusses how rising prices, wage stagnation, and broader economic pressures…
- Chemonics and ASU proved the supply chain talent was already there
A global learning model shows how employers can expand workforce capability through accredited…
- 46 firms accounted for half the wealth generated by the stock market over the past 100 years, researchers say
An ASU finance expert shares insights with CNBC Make It on the long-term concentration of stock…